Eric Fulwiler contributed to this article both in spirit and tone. The last section is his addition, quoted verbatim. He blogs at Opinion at Large, and is really wicked smart. Follow him on Twitter, and read his blog. He’s my new hero.
What if I told you that you could have my services for free? What if I told you that there was absolutely zero-risk to bringing in a social media consultant, someone who had experience training businesses in social media, worked with them to integrate and synchronize their marketing efforts to include social media marketing? What if I told you that instead of charging you X thousands of dollars a month you could keep your cash and only pay me if I increased your business. Would you rather have a 10% of something or 100% of nothing?
I am in the services business. I have knowledge and insight that I am willing to trade you for money. To be honest, I feel too much like a lawyer. I get paid whether my services help you or not. I think this is emblematic of a broken way of doing business. Personally, I’d rather have my pay tied to my performance. I’d rather my interests and the interests of the business I am working with be intertwined. This incentivization scheme is more positive.
Let’s see how this might work:
- Instead of paying me two thousand dollars a month to train your staff, rebuild or redesign your website, market your business (traditionally and digitally), you offer me a percentage of any business that I generate. Let’s say the number is 20 percent.
- We take a snap shot of your business from the last month, the last quarter and the last year and agree on exactly what income you have as your baseline. Any business going forward, for a specific amount of time, call it 6 months or a year, I get 10 percent of.
- Let’s say your net income before “hiring” me, is $15,000 a month. In month 1 of our interaction there is no change. Therefore I get paid nothing. Integrating social media marketing takes time, and requires the bandwidth for businesses and marketers to spend time blogging, twittering, figuring out how to market with new tools like Foursquare and Groupon. These tools take time to take effect. So fine, first month, your business is where it was, and I get paid nothing
- Second month you see a 30 percent bump in your business. We ran a Groupon special and had 500 check-ins on Foursquare, of which 35 took advantage of the “Mayor Special” we had integrated. So now there is $4500 dollars that goes into the shared pool. I get 20% of that which is $900. You have $3600 more dollars.
Would you make this deal?
The following is from Eric:
There is something wrong with the social media consulting industry. There is too much risk, and not enough proven reward. Not to mention the market is completely over-saturated with experts and thought leaders. But the industry will evolve. It’s just a question of whether you will be in front of or behind that trend.
Business is an equation. Return/investment. The problem with the current social media consulting model is that the return is uncertain and sometimes unproven, while the investment is usually fixed and definite. A business pays 5,000 dollars a month for a consultant who they hope will increase their business. In this situation, the equation looks like this: ???/5000. Not too appealing to a business owner.
What is appealing to a business owner (or anybody) is a no risk investment. A business pays only if there is a proven ROI on the social media consulting. The equation becomes something like: x/.2x. A business pays 1000 to a consultant at the end of one month because it earned an additional 5000 in revenue over that period. In this equation there is no question mark, and R will always be greater than I. If return is always greater than investment, there is no risk for the investor.






{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }
I have this outside partner, claims to be from a big famous french banking family. I have a deal I was tired of raising money for, and this guy claimed to be able to bring in the money. In this business of money raising, it's so easy to quantify results: money! So anyway I wasn't going to pay him up front cash for his services, because what incentive does he then have? But he wanted stock in the company up front. I said ok, I mean how does he benefit from getting up front private company stock? And btw I just set the valuation, this wasn't market forces at work! So I figured he was aligned. Turns out I found a bad egg, this guy on top of being of questionable backgroung, a la clark rockefeller, he was just a kook, and he was out to waste time, and his alignment was with the bottle or with the pipe or whatever and not with the money, because he didn't monetarily benefit from bs'ing me or wasting my time. Here's my point: alignment is key. I brought this one up a while ago so I feel like this is a good post for me to pontificate on, but ya I think that offering a back end incentive solution to a client AT LEAST shows youre interested in being aligned. It's really sad and really freaking me out lately but most people devote more time to bs'ing and deceiving than they would have to devote to truth and value to make the same money. People are just stupid. But I don't believe in total back end deals (unless she has a really cute back end broom ching), I think a company should have to pay you for your time, some nominal amount. So I am in favor of a hybrid of up front cash plus back end, as I mentioned in the past.
Cass
Yep. Cassel. That is just what I am thinking of offering. Fine don't
want yo pay me? Then let's share. I am confident in my abilities to
bring in business over time that will make it worthwhile to spend the
first two months or so working and setting things up for free. U feel
me?
I love the moment when you flip the pitch deck to the compensation slide. It's like, ya you think i'm gonna be free but we have to talk about the MONEY nino brown.
Interesting proposition.
On one hand, your earning potential skyrockets. On the other hand, your risk skyrockets, too. Not just because you might not perform, but you might be put in the position of having to “prove” your stuff lead to a sale, and without direct access to the backend, or to their books, it sets you up to be lied to. So you need to have an iron clad contract. And then you'll really feel like a lawyer.
I love the quote from The Joker (Heath Ledger, rest in peace): “If you're good at something, never do it for free.”
You know your service has value. If your client engages you for business, and you provide your service, and you get 6 million people to their site, or restaurant, or whatever, but they sell no product because their product sucks, is that really on you? Do you still want that percentage of sales? Or do you want to be paid for your god damn time thank you very much?
Clearly, I don't have the answer. But I do know that time is the only true commodity. And if you are spending some of yours on some business, don't let them make you feel like it's worthless. You still used your brain to address their need.
i tend to agree with you but thought the proposition was worth exploring
from a purely intellectual position. I think ultimately its not workable
because there is no legal agreement that ironclad. I'll end up in court
trying to extract pennies.
But it might be nice to offer firms as a choice.
Thanks for the comment bud!
zz
Its definitely an interesting idea. I think Erin Blaskie (http://twitter.com/ErinBlaskie) has actually tried something like this. I don't know how it worked out, but you could always ask her.
Andrew makes some good points. You really have to be choosy about which gigs you take, because your work is not the only variable in the equation, and if all other things are wrong (poor quality product, etc) you're not going to get paid no matter how good your work is.
Since you'd be offering to work for “free” as many would see it, you'd probably have a lot of people beating down your door to try to get in. This would hopefully mean you could be quite picky about who you take up.
On the other hand, a lot of the people looking for your “free” services might be total hacks. Having a barrier to entry isn't always a bad thing.
Cheers.
great comment and thanks for coming by. I am definitely going to ask @erin
about her experiences!
true that if the word got out that I would have lots of companies beating
down my door, and then could only choose the ones that I felt had the best
chance for eventually paying out!
Z
Absolutely true. It's interesting to think about what “value” means, in any context. I like the intellectual stuff. It's a nice break from, well, you know, the rest of the internet.